What is Continuity of Government (COG) ?
Warning! There are NUT CASES questioning the official story of 9/11 by way of peer-reviewed, open-access journals. Do not let these careful, independent, analytical reviews confuse you! Everyone knows that the Official Story has been written and therefore all dissenters are CRAZY.
Nevertheless, while watching the C-SPAN BookTV presentation on 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, I decided to follow up on this and a couple related questions made by the authors of this book.
9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Vol. 1
Continuity of Government in the United States
"The main points of such a plan in the United States are to suspend certain parts of the United States Constitution and to allow the alternative use of federal land and buildings (including use as internment camps) by FEMA for the housing/detention of US citizens as required, as well as any rescue/recovery operations. It also allows for power in the US to be centralized to the White House and 'appointment of military commanders to run state and local governments and declaration of martial law'[1]. In the former regard the United States arrangements for Continuity of Government are unusual. The plans in most countries are intended to preserve the legal and constitutional framework, the American system relies on circumventing it. There is no legal basis for the imposition of so-called 'martial law.'"
BTW, are you a fan of Fox News demigod William Kristol? He's Chairman of Project for the New American Century (PNAC) and a leading author of the September 2000 report, Rebuilding America's Defenses that just happens to describe the necessity of a new pearl harbor. Go ahead, download the PDF document and search for Pearl Harbor, and tell us we're reading out of context.
United States Military Oath of Allegiance:
Dan Rather comments as the building collapses, stumbling on his own words as he suggests it looks like "well placed dynamite" was used to collapse WTC 7.
So what happened to WTC 7? Why does the official 9/11 Commission Report not even mention that building? What if a DOMESTIC ENEMY were to infiltrate our own White House? Would YOU, "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC?" No politician, no political party is above that oath -- a lifetime oath -- and one that I TOOK as a U.S. Army Officer; one that I will defend with my very life, if necessary. How about you?
Nevertheless, while watching the C-SPAN BookTV presentation on 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, I decided to follow up on this and a couple related questions made by the authors of this book.
9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Vol. 1
Continuity of Government in the United States
"The main points of such a plan in the United States are to suspend certain parts of the United States Constitution and to allow the alternative use of federal land and buildings (including use as internment camps) by FEMA for the housing/detention of US citizens as required, as well as any rescue/recovery operations. It also allows for power in the US to be centralized to the White House and 'appointment of military commanders to run state and local governments and declaration of martial law'[1]. In the former regard the United States arrangements for Continuity of Government are unusual. The plans in most countries are intended to preserve the legal and constitutional framework, the American system relies on circumventing it. There is no legal basis for the imposition of so-called 'martial law.'"
BTW, are you a fan of Fox News demigod William Kristol? He's Chairman of Project for the New American Century (PNAC) and a leading author of the September 2000 report, Rebuilding America's Defenses that just happens to describe the necessity of a new pearl harbor. Go ahead, download the PDF document and search for Pearl Harbor, and tell us we're reading out of context.
United States Military Oath of Allegiance:
I, {insert name here}, do solemnly swear, (or affirm), that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.
Dan Rather comments as the building collapses, stumbling on his own words as he suggests it looks like "well placed dynamite" was used to collapse WTC 7.
So what happened to WTC 7? Why does the official 9/11 Commission Report not even mention that building? What if a DOMESTIC ENEMY were to infiltrate our own White House? Would YOU, "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC?" No politician, no political party is above that oath -- a lifetime oath -- and one that I TOOK as a U.S. Army Officer; one that I will defend with my very life, if necessary. How about you?
Labels: infective.invective
posted by ftw at 9:14 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home